I believe in the "Holocaust" but ...

As a young educated man I think I am mature enough to logically reason about an incident without any biasing from my religion, past right/wrong understandings, personal opinions and so forth; and only lay down the facts and draw a logical conclusion.
First of all, before entering in any judgment against me, I must strongly express that I believe Holocaust happened and that it is, without a single doubt, the most distressing genocide of all times along with the darkest, most shameful relic of the history of human being. I say that because all the bloodshed during the long history of man, after Adam and Eve were expelled from heaven, took place in ages were wisdom and rationality were in the minority and people were unfamiliar with the truth, sophistication, common sense and so on and so forth; the civilization trusted sorcery, witchcraft or the their brightest hours religion that was supported by miracles instead of rationale and intelligence.
But Holocaust took place in times when Germany were the home to two thirds of Nobel prize winners. Education was a must rather than a luxury and Europe had already experienced the suffocation before the Renaissance and the pain and agony of multiple wars. At such times, a genocide in dimensions of the "Holocaust" was so far from a sound mind.
But.... I must protest to some specific aspects of the scenario:
First and foremost, most importantly, it makes me utterly uncomfortable to realize that no lawful or unlawful, private or public, official or otherwise, biased or unbiased party has the permission to question the "Holocaust" or as it is referred to by Jews: the "Shoah". No media has the authority to publish or publicize anything even remotely siding with anti-Seminism or revisionism. The fact that the Jewish community unjustly underwent so much terror, trauma, pain and agony and is not fair to them to have them defend their honor or repeatedly prove what had happened to them. But, personally I think, people are smart enough to opt for the truth.

6 million, 5 million, 3 million or 1.5 million... There is not a reliable source to conclude the actual number of victims. But all of them are over a million people. It is a population of a large city today. Can you imagine one whole city to be eliminated within a few months time??? The method of choice, according to eye witnesses and perpetrators, was suffocation by gas in deliberately constructed, disguised as wash & shower facilities, establishments called gas chambers. Each consisted of several spaces the size of a large bedroom. Some say the gas was carbon-monoxide (CO) generated from a diesel exhaust. But, my very basic chemistry & physics knowledge suggests that diesel exhaust is not able to generate that much CO besides the soot and is highly impractical for the purpose. Germans had many Nobel prize winners and best engineers in the world who could certainly come up with something more sensible for such purpose.
Another fishy fact is that the number of witnesses and their credibility is highly under question. After Hitler killed himself and his right hand also committed suicide (or was murdered) in prison, Hess I think was his name or something like this, there is absolutely no high rank SS official, who was directly involved, not just a low level petty officer, on the record who was properly tried in a neutral court who kept records or at least elaborately interviewed. For a phenomenon at this scale, one escaped victim, a barber, a passerby who observed an empty train from cross the street and one singular petty officer certainly are not considered as concluding evidence.
Also, well I am not supposed to say think but what the heck... I think Hitler had extraordinary leadership skills such as Khomeini. These guys have that Charismatic effect on their people and by the knowledge I think I have from such leaders, I can say that the one thing that they all have in common is that: "they certainly believe in whatever they say and also they believe it to be the truth". And mass murder is the byproduct of leaders who lack ideology and know that they don't have much to offer so they prefer people to be scared of them just like Saddam Hussein. Hitler committed suicide that I think was very bold of him. whereas Saddam, MohammadReza Shah of Iran etc, cowardly either fled to a hole or surrendered. In any event, in my eye, mass murder, genocide and betrayal to the man kind is their shield to their fear. They know the place they occupy is not rightfully theirs. They know what they truly deserve so they kill to prove their power, because they know no better way. It is the only way they can feed their pain and anguish they are in.
But true charismatic leaders, they do not kill unless it is the only means to their ultimate goal or they truly have to. Take Iran-Iraq war for example, Saddam easily used chemical weapons and left thousands Iranians dead or as good as. Khomeini could have just as easily done the same but he chose not to. Mohammadreza Shah of Pahlavi just as easily opened fire to his own people protesting in the streets on many occasions. Something after thirty plus years you see again in the same streets just because the leader up there also lacks charisma and fears from his own shadow. I mean it is the exact same psychology, same symptoms, only the names have changed. It is interesting how history repeats itself in only three decades. And surprisingly people have not yet learned nothing.
Oh, I got distracted too far from the subject...Anyway, I think the "Holocaust" in these claimed dimensions, cannot be Hitler's, neither physically nor psychologically. Ergo, there are a few possibilities: it did not happen in these dimensions and shape and form; or it did not happen under Hitler's direct commands or he was not aware of its exact nature; or it did not happen at all. The second possibility is almost unlikely, as eliminating millions of people by tricking your boss sounds not just funny but impossible. The third possibility is also out of the question because there are just too many facts for it to be a hoax. Then it is only the first option left. And it also fits why they would not let anyone to even speak against it!! So... bang.... it is solved... Holocaust was mischievously altered perhaps to fit some other purpose.
All and all, it is just a theory. I may be wrong and it happened exactly it was projected....... Nah.... it is just too far from it.....
Anyhow, I can not wait to see what everyone's ideas are, but of course without egotistic exhortation.
Good luck.....